Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Volume 57, Issue 5, Page 535-543, May 2023.
Background:Tenecteplase is a genetically engineered fibrinolytic with growing interest in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Compared to alteplase, tenecteplase is effective for neurologic improvement following ischemic stroke in patients with large vessel occlusions who are eligible for thrombectomy and for mild ischemic strokes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 0 to 5.Objective:The purpose of this study is to determine if safety outcomes are different in patients receiving tenecteplase and alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.Methods:This retrospective cohort reviewed all patients who received alteplase or tenecteplase from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients admitted before April 28, 2020, received alteplase intravenous bolus over 1 minute followed by an infusion over 1 hour, for a total of 0.9 mg/kg. Patients admitted after this date received tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus over 5 to 10 seconds. Any patient transferring from an outside facility was excluded. The primary outcome was major bleeding.Results:There was no significant difference in major bleeding between alteplase and tenecteplase (40 [18%] vs 21 [18.1%], P = 0.985). There was no significant difference in all-cause inpatient mortality for alteplase versus tenecteplase (10 [5%] vs 5 [4%], P = 0.934) or in adverse events between the groups (22 [9%] vs 14 [12%], P = 0.541) for alteplase and tenecteplase, respectively.Conclusions and Relevance:Tenecteplase had similar rates of major bleeding versus alteplase and may be a reasonable alternative in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
Background:Tenecteplase is a genetically engineered fibrinolytic with growing interest in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Compared to alteplase, tenecteplase is effective for neurologic improvement following ischemic stroke in patients with large vessel occlusions who are eligible for thrombectomy and for mild ischemic strokes with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 0 to 5.Objective:The purpose of this study is to determine if safety outcomes are different in patients receiving tenecteplase and alteplase for acute ischemic stroke.Methods:This retrospective cohort reviewed all patients who received alteplase or tenecteplase from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients admitted before April 28, 2020, received alteplase intravenous bolus over 1 minute followed by an infusion over 1 hour, for a total of 0.9 mg/kg. Patients admitted after this date received tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus over 5 to 10 seconds. Any patient transferring from an outside facility was excluded. The primary outcome was major bleeding.Results:There was no significant difference in major bleeding between alteplase and tenecteplase (40 [18%] vs 21 [18.1%], P = 0.985). There was no significant difference in all-cause inpatient mortality for alteplase versus tenecteplase (10 [5%] vs 5 [4%], P = 0.934) or in adverse events between the groups (22 [9%] vs 14 [12%], P = 0.541) for alteplase and tenecteplase, respectively.Conclusions and Relevance:Tenecteplase had similar rates of major bleeding versus alteplase and may be a reasonable alternative in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
