By Kevin E. Noonan — In a month where the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has exercised its judicial muscle by striking down several well-established precedents, one portion of their jurisprudence is as fixed a constant as the North Star: the Court will not address the morass in patent subject matter eligibility created by the decisions in Bilski, Mayo, Alice, and Myriad, and once again refused to do so in American Axle & Mfg. Inc v. Neapco Holdings LLC. For a Court whose political inclinations are evident and frequently commented upon, the chorus of dissent regarding the state of subject matter…
